MooglyCAL2026 Block 3 is a marvelous design by Jennifer Dickerson of Fiber Flux! The Cozy Circles Crochet Square is a beautiful little blanket of its own, made with small motifs! Get all the details for this free crochet along, and the free pattern link below! Disclaimer: This post includes affiliate links; materials provided by Local […]
The post MooglyCAL2026 Block 3 appeared first on moogly. Please visit www.mooglyblog.com for this post.
3The post Video of the Day – The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, 2016 appeared first on Blogtor Who.
February is here, bringing all the cozy, creative vibes, and it’s time for another Crochet and Catch Up on Moogly! Let’s relax with some yarn chat, check in on current projects, share new patterns, and take a peek at what’s coming up next. Grab your hook and join me for a warm, fiber-filled hangout and […]
The post Crochet and Catch Up with Moogly - February 4, 2026 appeared first on moogly. Please visit www.mooglyblog.com for this post.
0Nostalgia. We’ve been riding that wave for a while now.
While I have certainly been guilty of buying into it, there is an argument to be made that if we are always revisiting the well of the past, we aren’t really creating for the future. As much as I love new Star Trek or Star Wars projects, I’m just as happy to see wild, new ideas like K-Pop Demon Hunters. My point is this: if we continually look back, we fail to create new worlds or explore new mechanics, and we risk diminishing the very things we loved in the first place.
So, let’s talk about my own nostalgia for old tabletop role-playing games.
If you follow me on social media, you probably know that I always bring up three games: Torg, Fading Suns, and Space: 1889.
After years of waiting, the stars finally aligned. Ulisses Spiele acquired the rights to all three! They put out new editions, Torg Eternity and Fading Suns 4th edition, and licensed Space: 1889 After to Strange Owl Games.
Torg Eternity arrived with an updated, cleaned-up, and easier-to-understand version of the original rules. I ran the Free RPG Day adventure in 2017 and enjoyed it greatly. I backed the original crowdfunding campaign—and all subsequent campaigns—usually at the higher tiers. I have everything Ulisses Spiele has published for the line. I’ve read a lot of it.
But the game is not perfect. While simpler than the original, I find it a bit fiddlier than I currently enjoy, and the supplements have been of varying quality.
I realized that I don’t think I’d run Torg Eternity using the official rules. If I finally get to run the big Torg campaign I’ve been dreaming of, I’d probably use a different system. I already ran a classic Torg prequel using d20 Modern.
So, what system would I use today? Savage Worlds.
I am currently running my dream Fading Suns campaign, and while the new 4th Edition books by Ulisses are beautiful, the rule system feels needlessly complex for my table. So, I am running it using Savage Worlds.
Notice a pattern?
Space: 1889 had a Ubiquity version from Clockwork Publishing (and still available from Ulisses Spiele if you click the previous link), and the current Space: 1889 After has two versions: the Empyrean system and a D&D 5e version. I own the 5e version. But if I ever run Space: 1889, care to guess what system I’d use? (Pinnacle even put out a Savage Worlds version of Space: 1889: Red Sands some years ago, so the work is already done!)
What does this all mean?
First, it means I really like Savage Worlds! As our gaming group grows older and gaming time becomes increasingly precious, we stick with the systems we know and enjoy rather than crunching through new rulesets.
But second, it means that my nostalgia was never really for the mechanics—it was for the worlds. My love was for the setting, the experiences, and the creativity they fueled, not the specific game engine. I am glad I’ve gotten to play Fading Suns. I hope to play my planned Torg campaign at some point. Space: 1889 is not currently at the top of my list, but I’d play it.
However, I also want to play new games. I want to try new systems and have new experiences. I want to run a Powered by the Apocalypse game. I want to try Blades in the Dark (or one of the Forged in the Dark hacks). I want to run Mothership and something on the Year Zero Engine.
Ultimately, I love nostalgia. We got new versions of Ravenloft, Twilight: 2000, Savage Rifts, and Palladium Books even published a new TMNT edition. But I also want new games that explore what TTRPGs can do today.
By now, I think most of my nostalgia wants have been addressed. Well, with two exceptions.
I know we’ll likely never get this because of licensing issues, but I’d love to see a new version of the Buck Rogers XXVc TTRPG. (The closest we can get right now is the amazing Overlords of Dimension-25 by Christian Conkle).
And finally, I’d love to see a new edition of The Whispering Vault.
One last thought: seriously, when are we getting the K-Pop Demon Hunters TTRPG?
A ragged sailor speaks of an island no chart has ever shown—one he claims rose straight from the sea, crowned by a bone-colored lighthouse that casts shifting, multihued light across the waves. His tale might be madness… if not for the opalescent, fist-sized pearl he carries as proof. When both sailor and pearl end up in the possession of Gokleve’s notorious twins Valde and Valada, the pair hires you to voyage to this impossible island and return with whatever pearls you can pry from its shores. Are the pearls the true prize… or just the bait?
This 28 page adventure uses six pages to present seven rooms in some sea caves that have you fighting. Right out of the 4e era, you’ll be stabbin and everything else is a pretext. Or maybe it’s the 3.5 era since there’s not much terrain. Whatever.
This is weird. The sea caves, the actual adventure locale, are just a few pages long, six if I recall. The lighthouse, the one that features so prominently on the cover and in all of the adventure lead-in? Not covered. Or, rather, it is essentially a rock formation on the island. It gets about three quarters of a page description which amounts to “The lighthouse which pierces the island is a magical device, not a building.” There are a few odds and ends, like seaweed covering it, but that’s the description. Which I guess means you can’t go inside? Which is why I’m calling it a rock formation. It’s got that beam of light, rotating, at the top, which is clearly magical. But there’s no notes about fucking with it. About climbing the tower, flying up, or painting the lenses with tar or anything else. When you make your entire adventure about the fucking lighthouse then you’d better do something with the lighthouse, or have some way of communicating to the players “Hey, its not about the lighthouse” once they reach the lighthouse. Yes, you can see a cave mouth, which is where the party will end up, so, good on yeah matey.
Ket’s mention the quantum blind dude. He’s on the top of a mast of a wrecked ship. Unless the party doesn’t go to the wrecked ship in which case he’s in a wrecked lifeboat at the cave mouth. Its actually called “QUANTUM [Dudes Name]” Why? He’s not crucial to the adventure, so why the focus on making ABSOLUTELY sure the party meets him? And, during that HUGE leads in to the adventure we get LONG sections about V&V, the crime lords who hire the party to go the lighthouse. Like, pages of this shit. (Clearly, we have a hard on for V&V the crime lords. And for the quantum dude, for some reason. Search me. But I can tell when someone is a mary sue DM pet.) With some nice fucking LONG read-aloud. In Italics. In a fancy fucking font in italics, and long. Look, I promised not to do the screencap thing anymore, but come on man, this shit is falling closer to the illegible end of the scale than the legible. Weird flourishes at the ends of e’s. I guess its supposed to be nautical-ish? BUT ITS FOR THE FUCKING DM. The DM has to be able to read the fucking shit and communicate yor long ass soliloquy to the players. I’m all for tormenting the players with handouts that nigh illegible, but not the DM. The DM needs information presented in a way that they can absorb it and transfer it to the players in an efficient and effective manner. Also, the island “appears to have a working lighthouse.” There’s a giveaway if I ever saw one. No. It has a working lighthouse. There’s a tower with a light spinning at the top. As far as anyone else knows its a fucking lighthouse. Nobody needs to know it’s not actually a lighthouse. (Although, isn’t it? Is it form or is it function? It’s tall with a rotating light you can see. It’s a lighthouse. The purpose of the light is to attract ship … so its function is not that of a lighthouse?)
Oh, what am I bitching about here … the interactivity is just stabbing shit. Go in to a room, stab the monster, go in to the next room, stab the monster, go in to the next room. Repeat. There’s a person or two (See Also: Quantum Dude) who are like “we shipwrecked!” and are now have facehugger ova in them. They get, maybe, one sentence. Actually, most things get one sentence. Stab stab stab. Stab stab stab. I’m gonna call this a 3.5 adventure since there’s stabbing without the terrain effects needed to make it a 4e adventure.
Room two of this exciting sea cave adventure: “2. Nest. The nest is home to the tenders.” Are you not eNtErTaInEd?! There’s a couple of bullet points for the DM to embellish upon, but the core room dynamic is more than a little lacking here. And, it’s just stabbing after all, so any description is just wasted. I guess this genre is for people who want to play mini’s but, I don’t know, want more? Roguelike D&D where combat is the main thing but you can level up and the graphics are raytraced?
And that’s all too bad because there is some imagery here and there that is decent. “Bodies lie about the wreck, some wedged into the rocks where golden crabs feed upon them.” Noice! Always great when the crabs have some steamed human legs. And eyes. Nothing like a good rotten crab feeding frenzy to conjure the nausea, or, there’s this water elemental you can meet. It looks like an eel, its totem creature. That’s a great idea. Its tormenting a fisherman: “darting under to menace the trapped fisherman. The fisherman was harvesting eels, the elemental’s totem species, which pissed it off. It now plans on drowning its victim, Lars. The more prolonged the terror, the better.” That’s great! I mean, it’s all useless here since you’re just gonna stab it. But the potential man … and lets make lars desperate, so even though he KNOWS there’s this eel creature, there are also a lot of eels, and his families hungary, or he owes a lot or something. And maybe tie that in to the crime lords? Who have hired you. Great! Or, we could just put in some backstory for no reason and then just make the encounter a combat. *sigh*
This is $3 at DriveThru. The preview is the first four pages, which is useless. Title pages, credits, one page of background. The purpose of the preview is to show us enough so that we can make an informed purchasing decision. Like, show us an encounter so we can understand your style of D&D.
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/en/product/548411/the-cresting-pearl-light?1892600
The post Video of the Day – Doctor Who: The Celestial Toymaker Animated, 2026 appeared first on Blogtor Who.
Original Video: https://youtu.be/6ijRtEpQknk
The transcript is lightly edited from an auto-generated one. Expect typos and worse ;)
A viewer asked, how do you handle illusions in a dungeon, like a false wall or a false floor? And actually, I love that question because illusions can be brilliant, or they can turn your dungeon into a paranoid trap. Every stone slog where nobody trusts anything. So I'm going to give you how I run illusions in old school play.
Scary. Useful. Most importantly, fair. Because the moment your players feel like the DM can just lie, whenever you don't have tension anymore, you've got distrust.
So we got the question then. Like what is an illusion when illusion is not a gotcha? It's a problem of perception. So I'm always thinking three things when it comes to illusions. Is there something that feels off if the players pay attention? Can they test it in a way that makes sense in the world? The game world? And if they don't test it, is the consequence fair? Something that would follow naturally. If the only answer is you should have guessed. That's not clever. That's me being smug.
And I can be smug, but that's not what we want. People generally say illusion and mean different things. And these are the big ones. First, a sensory illusion is something that isn't physically there.
So it's like a wall that looks solid, but you can walk right through it. It doesn't block you with stone. It blocks you because you believe it does.
Second, a real hazard that's disguised like a pit that's absolutely real. But it's covered by an illusion that looks like normal floor. See, that's a real threat. Wearing a fake face.
And then you have the third type. Misdirection, fake exits, fake doors, Phantom treasure stuff meant to burn off time. Split the party or put you into a bad position. Once you know which one it is, making a ruling gets relatively simple. Now do I telegraph them?
All right, so I don't announce. There's an illusion here. And hold up a sign. No, but I do give players something they can notice.
Now, my favorite clues are practical, physical, and generally tied to how dungeons work. So dust behaves wrong. Or that part of the floor is just too clean, too undisturbed, or there's dust piled oddly along the edge of a wall. Aaron, smoke. Behave wrong. A draught from a sealed corridor. Torch. Smoke pulling sideways. Sound behaves wrong. Uh. Short hall that echoes like it's much deeper than it appears. Monster behavior can often give it away. Goblins vanishing in a dead end. Voices behind a solid wall. Patrol routes that don't make sense. And that last one. That last one is DM gold. Okay, because it makes the dungeon feel lived in. Like a place with routines. Not a trick box.
So in old school play the player's best tools aren't skill checks. I know I say that a lot. Or a variation of that a lot. This is aimed at my 5e players. I know I have a 5e audience. I'm just going to remind you old school play the players best tools aren’t skill checks. It's time. Caution, interaction and gear. So when someone says, I checked the wall, I ask, how are you checking it? Because the how is the entire game.
Here are the tests that matter most, especially when it comes to illusions.
Touch and pressure. Right? If it's a walk through illusion, this should reveal it quickly, right? You press, you lean, you push. You touch the wall with your ten foot pole. You poke it with your sword. The wall's not there. You probe ahead. Okay. The ten foot pole earns its keep.
If they probe a suspicious floor and it goes through the floor, they should get information before someone commits their weight to that location. Throw something. Toss a pebble, a coin, a torch, especially for false floors. The sound tells you plenty. The missing coin will tell you plenty. Dust. chalk, flour. A little puff of flour at a wool can tell you if air is moving through it, especially if the flour goes right through it. Um, attempting to mark a wall with chalk. There's no wall, there's no surface. You're not marking it. But this play is smart, it's simple. And essentially it feels earned.
Mapping and logic. If the group maps carefully, illusions will get caught constantly. That's good. That's not a bad thing. That's what careful play buys you. And just to say it, if the players interact in a concrete way, I don't make them roll to earn reality. They did the test. They get the result.
So Okay then. Well, when do you use saves or checks or when do you roll? I use saves when the illusion is acting like an attack on the mind. Panic images, phantom threats, disorientation, that sort of thing. But the player says I toss a copper on that suspicious tile. I'm not asking for a roll to see if they notice that the coin falls through the floor. The interaction is the answer. Player action first. Only when the magic is pushing back. Now illusions should have teeth, but the bite has to make sense.
So what consequences are appropriate? Waste of time. Right. Or counter checks. Torch burning down. Bad positioning. Splitting the party up. Noise that wakes the place up the resource drain. Because you chose the wrong approach.
And then there are some bad consequences or inappropriate instant death with no warning and no counterplay. I'm against that. When it comes to illusions or anything else, I don't like it. I'm not a fan of save or die out of the blue. What about there? There were no clues. But you should have known. And I think many of us have experienced that crap. If a party sprints down a dungeon hallway like it's a hotel corridor. I'm not advising that you run through the hotel corridor. Is that a convention? But if you do so, yeah, you might drop through a pit there because you're not looking for it. And that's fair play. But I still want something a cautious group could have noticed.
So let me give you two examples. The way I would run it. False wall that you can walk through. I describe a normal wall, but I usually include one clue a draft torch, smoke that's pulling strangely muffled voices, footprints that don't add up, or monsters disappearing into a dead end if they test it, touch reveals it. If they don't, they miss an advantage, a shortcut, a stash, a safer route, a prisoner, something meaningful but not campaign ending and not session fashion ending.
What about the popular false floor over a real pit. Same deal. Normal floor. Plus one detail that nags. To clean or the dust is undisturbed. Or there's a faint hollow note to the room. Stones are a little too perfect. Or there's a slight slope. Probe it. Toss something. Test it. Now they know. Ignore it and someone drops, takes damage, makes noise. And now the dungeon is awake. That's not mean. That's not arbitrary. Just cause and effect.
Now, the biggest illusion mistake is using illusions as a substitute for dungeon design. If the content is just a trick, players learn the wrong reason. Distrust everything. Slow down forever. The best illusions exist for a reason. Guarding something important. Supporting a faction that uses the illusion tactically. Hiding a bypass or escape route or funneling intruders into a bad approach. See when it serves the place players respect it even when it bites them. If you can answer these questions, your illusion is solid. What's the subtle clue? What's the practical test? What's the fair consequence if they ignore it? And listen, that's the whole philosophy.
Now, if you've got a favorite illusion, one that felt fair or one that felt like a cheap shot, drop it in the comments. I want to hear your war stories. Thank you for spending your time at the tavern and God bless.
Joining the push toward fiber sustainability is new Bernat Future Impact! This yarn is a blend of recycled acrylic, recycled cotton, and recycled polyester - and we're taking a closer look and giving away 8 skeins here on Moogly! Disclaimer: This post was sponsored by Yarnspirations and may include affiliate links; all opinions are my […]
The post Bernat Furture Impact Giveaway appeared first on moogly. Please visit www.mooglyblog.com for this post.
3The latest Doctor Who Yearbook from the people behind Doctor Who Magazine covers every television episode of 2025, as well as discussing the year’s books and audios, and events behind the scenes. Plus, of course, spin-off The War Between the Land and the Sea.
Coverage of Ncuti Gatwa’s second – and final – season as the Doctor includes:Other highlights this year:
Doctor Who: The 2026 Yearbook (c) Panini Doctor Who Yearbook 2026
Doctor Who: The 2026 Yearbook is on sale Thursday the 29th of January from the online Panini store, and other retailers priced £9.99 (UK). Also available as a digital edition from Pocketmags for £8.99. You can also save with a subscription, as well as receiving exclusive, text-free covers.
The post Doctor Who: The 2026 Yearbook appeared first on Blogtor Who.
The post Video of the Day – Half the Picture, 2026 appeared first on Blogtor Who.
Original Video: https://youtu.be/a3TtkSYi_zY
Transcript is lightly edited. Expect typos and worse ;)
This one comes straight from a viewer suggestion, and I'm actually glad it did, because decision paralysis is one of those table problems that can quietly kill a good RPG session. If you've ever sat there with a party staring at three doors, an intersection, a staircase, and a weird statue and nobody wants to pick one, well, yeah, that's the thing, right? That's the indecision.
And today I'm talking player to player. How to stop freezing, start moving and still play smart, especially in old school games where time is a resource and the whole we all just think about it is how you get jumped by wandering monsters and other assorted miscreants. So now being careful is good. I'm not saying it isn't. Caution keeps you alive, but decision paralysis. That indecision is where the table gets stuck in a loop. You find yourself asking for info you cannot realistically get. Maybe you keep inventing new plans instead of choosing one. Or you keep waiting for the DM to confirm that it's safe. I got news for you. It probably isn't going to. You're stuck trying to find a perfect option or solution that simply doesn't exist, and paralysis has a real cost. Torches. Burns. Spells tick away. Noise travels. Wandering monsters happen. The dungeon doesn't pause because the party is having a committee meeting.
I'm sorry. Here's why this happens. Most of the time, this indecision comes from one of a few places. Fear of consequences, right? Old school play has teeth. Some choices bite. That is literally part of the game. That's what you're in for. Then there's trying to solve it in your head instead of in the game world. People start playing mental chess or checkers instead of exploring. And then there's waiting for permission. Players want the DM to validate the plan. In old school play, Like I said before, you generally don't get that. Too many choices. Too many options. Every hallway becomes a debate, and debate becomes, it becomes the game.
So how do you fix that from the players side? Here's what works at real tables. Default to action, not discussion. And what do I mean by that? If the party is stuck, somebody has to be willing to say, alright, we're making a move. And not recklessly not Leroy Jenkins. No. Deliberately. If you want a simple mental rule. Movement creates information. You don't get certainty by thinking harder. You get it by probing the situation. So ask yourself, what's the smallest safe action we can take right now? What can we do that's reversible if it starts going wrong? You don't need a perfect plan. You do need the next move. So stop trying to pick the best plan and instead pick. It's actually good enough because most of the time you're chasing perfect. If you've got two or three decent options, arguing for ten minutes doesn't make choosing easier. It does burn time. It raises your party's risk, but doesn't make the decision making any easier. So use the good enough test. Does the decision keep us alive or move us towards the goal? Is the cost one that you're willing to pay? If yes, Have at it.
Make scouting a procedure, not an argument. A lot of paralysis is. We don't know what's behind that door. So don't debate the door. Scout the door. Old school tables live and die on cheap info. Listen at the door. Check for drafts, smells, sounds. Look for tracks. Examine the lock. Examine the hinges. Probe the floor with a pole. Use a mirror. Check the ceiling. Line the cure to what if it's trapped? It's not a debate, it's literally a procedure.
And if you want to be the player who saves the session, be the one who says, um, you know what? Before we argue and the DM rolls for a random encounter, let's gather a little info first. Assigned roles. So decisions don't require a committee if someone is steering the ship. Sorry, if everyone is steering the ship, then no one is steering the ship. Old school groups used roles for a reason. They kept the game moving forward. Now, what are some common roles? Caller or leader? It's not a dictator. It's he is a tiebreaker or she mapper. We've discussed that before. Now, if you're using a vdt, maybe mapping isn't an issue, but mapper scout generally a thief, maybe a halfling, maybe your elf quartermaster in charge of making sure there's enough light, managing the party's encumbrance, distributing the treasure. Who's the rear guard? So this reduces friction immediately because when there's a split, the table doesn't need to relitigate leadership every five minutes. Use a simple sixty second rule. When the table bogs down, somebody says, all right, 60 seconds And then we pick. Not to be rude, not to rush things along, maybe a little bit, but to prevent the session from becoming a debate club. See, in the fiction of the world that you're playing in, it's simply honest. Time is passing. The dungeon is alive
Decide by risk category, not exact outcomes, because you don't know what the exact outcome is going to be. Paralysis comes from trying to predict the exact result. if we open it, the gas. Or maybe it's ghouls or goblins or a pit trap you can't know, so don't play that game. Think in three general buckets low risk, medium risk and high risk and then act accordingly. Low risk. Do it medium risk. Take some precautions and then likely do it. High risk. Only if it's absolutely necessary or if you can shift the odds in your favor.
Keep the full moves in your pocket. That's another one, right? If you personally freeze, give yourself a cheat code. What do I mean when you're stuck? Default to one of the following and keep the game moving. Uh, I don't know what to do. Alright, you know what? I'll scout the next ten feet or I'll listen at the door. I checked the floor in front of the doorway. I look for tracks and notice there's a pattern to these things. Right? They create information without committing you to. What a huge decision. Force the plan into one sentence. If you can't say the plan in one sentence, it's not a plan. It may be brainstorming, but it's not a plan. For example, we wedge the door, listen, and fall back if we hear movement or conversation. That's a plan. You can execute that also. You know what you need to do. You need to accept that sometimes you'll be wrong. Keep things moving anyway, because that's the real fix.
Old school play isn't about never making a mistake. It's about adapting after the mistake. It's about buying information because information saves hit points and you don't buy information necessarily. With gold. Sometimes it's with time. And asking the GM questions. If you pick the wrong hallway, fine. Back out. Change tactics. Learn the party that never chooses anything gets punished harder than the party that chooses imperfectly.
Now let's remember the little thing I refer to as the the dungeon clock, right? It's always ticking. It doesn't stop. Tick tock. The dungeon clock. So what about a quick example? I'll throw this at you. The party reaches a T intersection, right? You can go left. You can go right. And then everybody starts arguing. And here's the smart play. Move! Stop! We're burning! Torch time. What is torch time mean? It means that we're burning time down to another random encounter. Check. So quick, Scout, I listen left. You listen right. If one sounds active, we take the quiet one. If both are quiet, we pick the right corridor and move. That's not perfect. Okay, but that is forward motion. So again, I want to thank the viewer who suggested this topic because decision paralysis It's common. It's fixable, and it's mostly fixed by players taking ownership of momentum.
Now this is also a collab with D'Angelo. Catch his channel linked below. We are experimenting with doing collabs on Mondays now. If you've got a table trick that breaks paralysis, whether it's caller rules or timers or marching order, discipline, whatever it is, anything. Drop it in the comments. I want to hear what actually works at your tables. Current tables. Real tables. And if you want more practical on how to play it at the table videos, you know what to do, right? Subscribe. I'll keep you focused on what helps you run and play better. Thank you and God bless.
TWO MONTHS AGO: The hedge-wizard Inatuy hired a troop of dwarven miners to excavate a sensitive area, beneath which he believes he has discovered the location of a potent magical artifact, The Key of the Condemned, rumored to allow a dying man to entrap his executioner at the moment of death, and live on. The dwarves made swift progress, and the hedge-wizard was impressed until two weeks ago when they failed to report their status. After a second failed report, he has hired a contingent of adventurers to investigate.
This eight page adventure presents about eighteen linear rooms in a dwarf mine. It’s Aliens, but with ankheg. Decent descriptions some nice horror elements. I am unfairly turned off by the directness of the appeal to Aliens rather than In The Spirit Of.
I hate comedy adventures. Just to be clear, this isn’t one, I’m just saying that I LOATHE them. Some humor in an adventure is fine, but I don’t like joke adventures. D&D doesn’t have to be serious, but when humor comes in it works better than when it is forced in. But, let’s say I come across the greatest comedy adventure ever. It’s perfect in every single way. Except it’s a joke adventure. All Mordenkainen Movie Studios and shit. There is no reason for me to hate it. ID STILL FUCKING HATE IT.
This is Aliens. Some wizard gets some dwarves to go find the key of blah blah blah and they excavate a mineshaft to do it. Wizzo doesn’t hear from them for two weeks so he sends you see what they are up to. You find the place looks deserted, somewhat wrecked, and signs/body horror slowly reveals itself. So far I’m down and loving this. A nice ‘inspired by’ idea, but this time with an ankheg next. I’m down with taking a monster from the game and trying to craft a slow burn/build up horror adventure out encountering it.
“You arrived at the mouth of a broken dwarven mine lift shaft in a small natural cave, chains dangling down into darkness with no sign of the lift itself. Small natural rivulets of water leak from the surrounding cave, and the sound of clinking chains & dripping water echo somberly up from the dark.” Hey, so that’s not bad! Chains DANGLING downRivluts LEAKING from wall, The sound of CLINKING chains. Somberly is a little purple, but whatever, it’s a decent description. And, as the entrance to The Mythic Underworld it’s not bad either! In that hole adventure awaits! How you getting down? Or, how about “Smell of vomit near unbearable. Once a cozy set of stables, the straw and dirt here are slick with the pulpy remains of three emulsified mules. Two large puddles of some sort of caustic biological waste burn the nose and block the path ahead.” The room title here is “Grisley Stable”, so the “once a zo stable” portion might be redundant, but it’s also not droning on, so we’ll let it slide. Otherwise, smell of vomit, caustic puddles, burning the nose, PULPY remains? Sounds great! This is all a part of the build up. Getting the party on edge. Really earning that first ankheg warrior attack. That attack, mot likely coming as a wandering encounter, will be earned and SO much more than just an attack thanks to the build up these early rooms provide. Nicely done.
Th dwarves had a pet badger, Jonesey, who is happy to see you, and gets visibly nervous when there are hidden monsters near. Ok. Sure. Lizard the little dwarf girl is hiding in a hole, the last survivor. Uh. Ok. There’s a sensor crystal to track incoming hostiles. Come on man. This isn’t an homage anymore. There’s a clay colum called Wehlun, or whatever that name is, who is a little sketchy, or can be. Dwarf chick is trapped in wall, half live. Uh huh. And, of course, there’s: “DWARVEN BURROWER (RM. 15 / 12): Large walking dwarven mining machine mech suit”
You lost me man.
I was pretty much down for a horror thing with ankheg, and taking some vibes from Alien/Aliens. But this is on the edge of farce territory, or at least a direct retheming. Sensor crystals. Recording crystals. Nah, I’m out.
Should you be out? Meh. It’s essentially a linear map. So you’re having “ an experience” rather than doing an osr rpg. Which maybe you’re cool with. The descriptions are fine, the build up is chill. The body horror has elements of The Thing without leaning too heavy there, The elements are all here. I just can’t run something this linear or something that is this close of a emulation of a movie.
Perhaps, though, there’s something original by the same designer?
This is free at DriveThru.
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/en/product/548230/ankheg?1892600