![]() |
|
Stupid Interwebs Arguments - Printable Version +- Furiously Eclectic People (http://furiouslyeclectic.com/forum) +-- Forum: Toying with Sardonicism (http://furiouslyeclectic.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Endless Blanket (http://furiouslyeclectic.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Thread: Stupid Interwebs Arguments (/showthread.php?tid=494) |
Stupid Interwebs Arguments - Oedipussy Rex - 08-25-2020 When you know you should drop it but refuse to do so. RE: Stupid Interwebs Arguments - Kersus - 08-27-2020 That made my eyelids evaporate. Couldn't look away. RE: Stupid Interwebs Arguments - Oedipussy Rex - 08-27-2020 I did learn that the antecedent precedes the precedent. RE: Stupid Interwebs Arguments - Kersus - 06-20-2021 Got into it on Twitter with some guy who thinks RPGs are failures if the GM is final arbiter. All things should be set and defined in the rules, no surprises, nothing made up, no rulings, etc. RE: Stupid Interwebs Arguments - Oedipussy Rex - 06-21-2021 (06-20-2021, 11:54 AM)Kersus Wrote: Got into it on Twitter with some guy who thinks RPGs are failures if the GM is final arbiter. All things should be set and defined in the rules, no surprises, nothing made up, no rulings, etc. What? Even chess hasĀ arbiters and I can't think of a game with a more complete rules set. |